What? You expected parts 1 - 5 first? What sort of coherent writer do you think I am?
Yeah, the title comes from a crappy movie from the 80's that stars a discredited and hopefully cancelled old comedian .. but I thought it would fit because the premise is that we are in the middle of a presentation by an older woman that has obviously done this sort of thing hundreds of times before, and wants to train the dommes of the future. And sometimes, the basics work the best.
This is a quickie, and I loved the AI image, especially when it can come down to what some could consider problematic plots. There should be no-harm and no-foul with this one. And it looks like every character in it has the right number of digits on their hands! That can also be problematic too!
Let me know what you think in the comments. Do you think it's best to use AI images when the plot lines can get somewhat squickish? In this case, I don't think it's an issue, as it's implied that right now, he is imagining he's back to his youth, and that this trance induced fantasy is burrowing into his subconscious, all the while, it's his adult self that is getting the makeover. Anyway, fell free to discuss below!
God, this was a great CD from the 90's that I bought when it came out. If you haven't heard the entire thing, you should stream it, buy it, or find a torrent!
that image looks a little too young? as in minor? I know it is AI, but...
ReplyDeleteAs I noted in the post, " In this case, I don't think it's an issue, as it's implied that right now, he is imagining he's back to his youth, and that this trance induced fantasy is burrowing into his subconscious, all the while, it's his adult self that is getting the makeover." .. so he's picturing the current situation as though he's young again in his mind .. and the domme is building up some new memories for him.
DeleteGee, now that you mentioned it in the cap, I recall the numerous times I was dragged off to the beauty parlor with mom. Now regret that I never had to opportunity to be in the chair too! Zoe
ReplyDeleteGlad you enjoyed it. I'm sure there are a number of readers out there that feel the same way. As a comparison, I don't think my daughter ever went to an actual beauty salon or hairdresser as defined by TG caption standards. She usually went to Supercuts, and she mostly dyes / cuts her own hair now as an adult.
DeleteI get where you're coming from and if I read this in a story, a man being led to manipulate his childhood memories in order to be a better sissy boi, I wouldn't have any problem with it. BUT, having it be an image crosses a line to me.
ReplyDeleteI always taught my nurses to write/read their documentation as if they're reciting it in a courtroom. When I see an image of an obvious underage person in any type of sexualized situation, I imagine myself trying to explain it in a courtroom. I don't think I could explain that satisfactorily to a judge as to why it's not kiddie porn.
Maybe I'm being overly cautious or just being a prude. But when I get anywhere close to that magically legal 18 year old line, I write specifically that they're an adult, whether that's specifically saying their age or putting it into a college setting as opposed to high school.
Point is well taken, and I'm still glad I posted it in general, as it has stirred some discussion. I do find it to be a definite gray area, as I think 1/4 of all Reluctant Press stories, with the old style greyscale images, deal with this very idea. I'm wondering if they had issues sending out their books through the post office back in the 70's. And there can be such leeway in pron in general, as evidenced by the number of videos on certain sites that contain some sort of content that involves things such as something that rhymes with 'winzest' even though it's obvious that it's not .. everything is implied.
DeleteAs such, I will probably pull it down soon anyway, as G00G13 implements yet another update of Terms of Service.
I'm glad you posted it as well. It's a real 'thinker' when you go down that path. I think the biggest problem is that you're right... it's a grey area. The reason it's a problem is that the legal system isn't set up for grey areas. It's black and white. Right and wrong.
DeleteI'm reminded of a recent newscast I was watching. I don't remember the specifics but there were reporting on the police catching someone who had an outstanding warrant. The specifically mentioned that they found "child pornography" on his computer and I naturally had a quick and hateful thought toward this person. As in, I wanted him to burn in hell. BUT, did he have something like this? And they're simply going by the lowest common denominator in calling it child pornography?
That's what worries me. I have enough porn (and kinky porn to most people) on my computer to worry some. I don't need any of it to be even slightly leaning toward child pornography.
Even with "rhymes with winzest", it's illegal as an act. Having stories or photographs of it isn't illegal.